Graduation Date

Fall 2024

Document Type

Thesis

Program

Master of Science degree with a major in Natural Resources, option Forestry, Watershed, & Wildland Sciences

Committee Chair Name

Erin Kelly

Committee Chair Affiliation

Community Member or Outside Professional

Second Committee Member Name

Mindy Crandall

Second Committee Member Affiliation

HSU Faculty or Staff

Third Committee Member Name

Jennifer Marlow

Keywords

Forest Policy, Private Forests, California, Oregon, Negotiation, Public involvement, Policy levers

Subject Categories

Forestry

Abstract

California and Oregon have long and dynamic histories of forest practice regulation on privately owned lands. Private lands remain connected to the larger environment despite arbitrary property boundaries, thus management decisions made on those lands impact ecosystem services across landscapes. Because forests have public trust resources such as clean water, there are policy tools that facilitate public involvement in private forest land decision making.

This study compares the trajectories of policy changes governing private corporate forest landowners in California and Oregon. Interviews with environmental advocates, agency members, and forestry professionals, along with document analysis, provide key insights to how private forest lands in these states have been regulated, and who has participated in the adoption of regulations. I trace how groups gain access to the regulatory process through various means, or “levers” – that is, how groups exogenous to the forestry sector have gained access to forestry decision-making. I employ Hall’s social learning framework (1993) to track policy change and to distinguish the levers available in each state. Hall’s notion of policy change includes first and second order changes, which are incremental changes that primarily maintain the status quo, and third order changes, or paradigm shifts, that create substantive change, including new policy tools.

Compared to Oregon, California experienced an early paradigm shift in 1975 when the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) began governing private forest practices. Since that time, CEQA has continually shaped and constrained private forestland practices in California. Conversely, Oregon, which lacks a state environmental policy act like CEQA, underwent a paradigm shift much later in 2022 with the passage of the Oregon Private Forest Accord. By tracing the shifting regulatory landscape in two states, this research provides useful insights, such as identifying how diverse groups can work together to manage environmental conflicts, and how public groups gain access to decision-making on private lands.

Citation Style

APA

Share

Thesis/Project Location

 
COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.