Home > Journals > HJSR > No. 38 (2016)
Humboldt Journal of Social Relations
Abstract
Trans and nonbinary communities often cite different priorities in their activism than do cisgender queer communities. This paper seeks to explore the effects of marriage equality, as well as the prioritization of marriage equality on queer trans and nonbinary individuals using a combined methodology of autoethnography and oral history. The findings suggest that trans individuals in queer relationships may have difficulty reconciling disparate aspects of their identities, including their political and activist priorities. The authors conclude that providing queer trans individuals platforms to voice their opinions is essential to ongoing dialogue about the role of marriage in queer communities.
Recommended Citation
Shultz, Jackson,
and
Kristopher Shultz.
2017.
"Queer and Trans After Obergefell v. Hodges: An Autoethnographic Oral History."
Humboldt Journal of Social Relations
1
(38):
46-61.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55671/0160-4341.1041
Included in
American Politics Commons, Comparative Politics Commons, International Relations Commons, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Studies Commons, Models and Methods Commons, Other Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, Other Political Science Commons, Political Theory Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons, Women's Studies Commons
